|

Methodist Healthcare Ministries works with similarly-focused
organizations and state government in developing more socially conscious
public policy. The purpose is to change legislative perspectives and
policies so that the root of the problems of the underserved are
addressed for the long-term.
Economic Stimulus Bill and the Least Served
State Children’s Health Insurance
Program
(SCHIP)
Status:
- The most recent federal CHIP (SCHIP) vote of the compromise bill on October 25,
2007 was 265 Ayes to 142 Nays.
- This was a bipartisan majority vote. However, this falls short of the 2/3 vote
needed to override a presidential veto.
- The Texas Congressional Delegation vote was: 11 Ayes to 19 Nays.
- This proposal is a $35 billion increase over five years ($7 billion increase per
year) and allow an additional 3.3 million children to enroll in SCHIP.
Summary:
- The SCHIP bill would provide 12 months continuous eligibility, and a basic
benefit package.
- There is flexibility for states to provide more services than the minimum level
and participate in the program.
- Undocumented immigrants are not and have never been eligible for SCHIP.
In this plan, states will implement CHIP with certain limitations. Each state:
- Will target the most needy—Medicaid as a priority, then CHIP
children.
- Still contracts with private care plans and providers to deliver care to
beneficiaries.
- Must ensure that children are not dropping private insurance for CHIP.
- Prohibited from providing benefits to a family earning above 300% FPL. 1
|
336,076 children are enrolled in Texas CHIP
Texas CHIP would increase by 140,000 kids if passed
Texas has 1.5 million uninsured kids |
For all votes, click here:
To find who your congress or state legislators are, click here:
1 300% Federal Poverty Level (FPL) is $49,800 for a family of three; for example
a working mom supporting two children. Texas CHIP has always been at 200% FPL
which is $34, 340 for a family of three.

|
1 |
Gohmert |
R |
N |
|
2 |
Poe |
R |
N |
|
3 |
Johnson |
R |
N |
|
4 |
Hall |
R |
N |
|
5 |
Hensarling |
R |
N |
|
6 |
barton |
R |
N |
|
7 |
Culberson |
R |
N |
|
8 |
Brady |
R |
N |
|
9 |
Green |
D |
Y |
|
10 |
McCaul |
R |
N |
|
11 |
Conaway |
R |
N |
|
12 |
Granger |
R |
N |
|
13 |
Thornberry |
R |
N |
|
14 |
Paul |
R |
N |
|
15 |
Hinojosa |
D |
Y |
|
16 |
Reyes |
D |
Y |
|
17 |
Edwards |
D |
Y |
|
18 |
Jackson Lee |
D |
Y |
|
19 |
Neugebauer |
R |
N |
|
20 |
Gonzalez |
D |
Y |
|
21 |
Smith |
R |
N |
|
22 |
Lampson |
D |
Y |
|
23 |
Rodriguez |
D |
Y |
|
24 |
Marchant |
R |
N |
|
25 |
Doggett |
D |
Y |
|
26 |
Burgess |
R |
N |
|
27 |
Ortiz |
D |
Y |
|
28 |
Cuellar |
D |
Y |
|
29 |
Green |
D |
Y |
|
30 |
Johnson |
D |
NV |
|
31 |
Carter |
R |
N |
|
32 |
Sessions |
R |
N |

Welcome |
What We Do |
Who We Are |
Our Mission |
Our Partners
| Departments
Career Opportunities |
Advocacy |
Press Room |
Newsletters |
Contact Us |
MHM
Intranet


|